Wednesday, November 25, 2015

Entry: Annotated Bibliography

Phipps, R., & Merisotis, J. (1999). What's the Difference? A Review of Contemporary Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Learning in Higher Education. Institute for Higher Education Policy. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED429524.pdf
This book analyzes the effectiveness of distance learning in higher education. It does this by examining various research projects done which examine the validity of online learning. Though this book determines the validity to be undetermined, it offers some insight into its effectiveness.

Galusha, J. (1998). Barriers to Learning in Distance Education. University of Southern Mississippi. http://www-tandfonline-com.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/doi/pdf/10.1080/87567559909595802
This book analyzes distance and on-campus learners' learning styles. It concludes that students who opt for distance courses are typical more independent and less traditional. It also deems online students to be intrinsically motivated and not reliant on the typical classroom structured rewards.

Cavanaugh, C. (1999). The Effectiveness of Interactive Distance Education Technologies in K-12 Learning: A Meta-Analysis. University of South Florida. http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED430547.pdf
This book looks at the effectiveness of Interactive Distance education and finds that there is a small positive effect in favour of distance learning. This book looks at the effectiveness levels of various approaches and will be useful when structuring my own class.

St. Cyr, S. (2004). Can Distance Learning Meet the Needs of Gifted Gifted Elementary Math Students? 27(2). http://gct.sagepub.com.ezproxy.library.ubc.ca/content/27/2/42.full.pdf+html

The effectiveness of adding a technological, distance aspect of learning to elementary/secondary schools to supplement the learning of gifted students. This study looks at the benefits, downfalls, and concerns of using technology in this manner.

Exit: Sword Dance Takeaway

   It was interesting to make shapes with the sticks and then try to replicate it with the swords. It would be a nice lesson to do with younger students who are learning the basic properties of shapes and how to form them. They can discover how intersecting lines form and the fewest amount of sticks to make different shapes.

   By incorporating the dance into it after they have played with the sticks they can see the relationship with how much simpler it is by having a group perform it. Hopefully they can think about the reasons for this.

   I also find that having them draw a picture of the shape they made was a good idea at helping some students visual and understand what is happening.

Thursday, November 19, 2015

Entry: Key Articles

With my partner Ying Ting, I will explore the idea of an on-line math classroom. We will likely look at the benefits this incurs, possibly for disabled or challenged students, as well as which age group benefits the most from this.

1. Dove, A. (2013). Students’ Perceptions of Learning in a Flipped Statistics Class. In R. McBride & M. Searson (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2013 (pp. 393-398). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

- Feedback from university students after they have taken a flipped Statistics I class.

2. Lynch, M. (2002). The Online Educator: A Guide to Creating the Virtual Classroom. RoutledgeFalmer.

- A detailed look at how to create and structure an effective online classroom.

3. Ashby, J. (2011). Comparing student success between developmental math courses offered online, blended, and face-to-face. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 10(3). Retrieved November 1, 2015, from http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/pdf/10.3.2.pdf

- Comparing success in three environments: online, face-to-face, and blended.